The article you are trying to view does not exist.
Try the search box at the top of the page.
Lots of sheep in the UK. Baaa!
It is, just like bird flu, another BS blown out proportion with the aim to bankrupt ranchers. It is by design, first there was a string of fake...
The UK is going through so much sh!t, it makes me wonder when the folks are actually going to push back en-masse. Not some random protests and...
What was it like out here when the soil could still sequester carbon? (Insert eye-roll here). Counterpunch perpetually panders to...
Egypt are being paid very handsomely to turn a blind eye
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
In this age of digital photography, it would be trivial for a photographer to:
1 "delete" the images off of the flash card
2 "prove" to the (non-tech savvy) interrogator that the files were deleted
3 replace the flash card with a new flash card and pocket the original card
4 later, "back at the ranch" the photographer could use commonly available image recovery software to retrieve the "deleted" images perfectly intact.
Delete doesn't always mean delete. Any professional photographer is going to have a pocket full of flash cards and will be very skilled at image recovery (if only because of the occasional "Oh, crap, what have I done").